Evaluating and Improving AI Output
Score AI drafts for accuracy, usefulness, and tone—then iterate with targeted follow-ups.
Evaluate before you publish
Ask: Is it correct? Is it complete? Is it the right tone? Is it actionable? A fast rubric stops you from shipping generic or risky text.
Give the AI a reviewer role
Paste your draft and ask the AI to critique it against your goal. Request specific fixes, not vague 'make it better' requests.
Iteration beats one-shot perfection
Plan for 2–3 passes: generate, critique, revise. Keep a short changelog of what you asked the AI to fix so you learn which instructions work.
Example
Critique pass
Make it better.
You are my editor. Goal: friendly email to a teacher, max 120 words, clear deadline question. Score my draft 1–5 on clarity, tone, and completeness. Then rewrite only the weak parts.
Takeaway The evaluation prompt defines criteria and limits the rewrite scope.
Mini challenge
Build a rubric
Create a 4-criteria rubric for judging AI answers on a task you use often.
Sample answer: Criteria: factual caution, structure, audience fit, and next action. Ask AI to score and suggest one fix per criterion.
Open this mission in the Kiwippy app to mark it complete and track progress.